The Voyage Cast: Real Talk on Marriage, Mental Health, & Emotional Growth

TVC Top 3: Meaning Dies, Minds Break: Despair, Radicalization, and the Collapse of Discernment

Eddie Eccker

Send us a text

In this gripping episode of Voyages Cast Top 3, Ed explores the growing psychological fractures shaping our world—from the global mental health crisis, to radicalization-fueled violence, to the slow collapse of digital discernment. These aren’t just headlines—they’re symptoms of something deeper: a culture losing its anchor in meaning.

We break down the UN’s latest mental health strategy, the tragic killings of Charlie Kirk and Iryna Zarutska, and the online radicalization of a teenage shooter. Along the way, we explore the roles of identity loss, emotional fragility, echo chambers, and the algorithms that profit from our pain.

This isn’t just about awareness—it’s a call to rebuild. To rethink where we find purpose, how we handle difference, and whether our online lives are helping us become more human—or more hollow.

Topics Covered:

  • The UN’s global shift toward existential mental health
  • The psychology behind recent acts of mass violence
  • How digital culture erodes our ability to think, feel, and connect
  • Tangible practices to restore meaning, maturity, and discernment

If this episode hits home—share it. Talk about it. We don’t heal in silence.

Support the show

For Counseling Support in Colorado Contact Voyages Counseling

Got a question or story to share? Record your message and send it in—we might feature it and answer it on the next episode!

This podcast is a labor of love, and you can help us keep it going strong. Join our Patreon community and become a key part of what makes it all possible.

Connect with us on the socials The Voyage Cast - Link Tree

Products used to create The Voyage Cast:
Rodecaster Pro 2
AKG P120 Mic
Mogami XLR Mic Cables

Imagine waking up each day feeling a little lost—like there’s no clear story guiding your life forward. No sense of “why” underneath the doing. Now picture a world where everyone’s shouting at extremes, where beliefs are hardened, and nuance? Gone. Everyone’s offended. No one’s grounded. And finally—imagine truth itself becoming something we don’t reason toward, but weaponize. Something we curate, distort, or toss away when it hurts too much. These aren’t isolated cultural trends. You can feel them in your gut. They’re signs of a deeper unraveling—a society losing its psychological and spiritual anchor.

Today, we’re diving into three stories that show how meaninglessness, emotional fragility, and the collapse of discernment are feeding each other—and what it might take to start stitching ourselves back together. Hello, this is Ed with the Voyages Cast Top 3—where we unpack the biggest stories shaping the future of mental health, culture, and spiritual resilience.

Over the past few years, global leaders have started using stronger language when it comes to mental health. It’s no longer just about managing symptoms or expanding access to medication. The World Health Organization and the Global Mental Health Action Network are both pushing for a broader shift—one that recognizes mental health not just as a clinical issue, but as a human one. Existential. Social. Environmental.

Take the WHO’s Mental Health Action Plan, which runs through 2030. It lays out four big issues we can’t ignore: First, mental health funding is still drastically low. Less than 2% of global health budgets go to mental health, even though it accounts for over 13% of the disease burden worldwide. Second, most systems are still stuck in a reactive, institutional model, rather than investing in community-based or preventative approaches. Third, we’re failing young people. Suicide and depression are on the rise, and yet youth mental health is consistently under-resourced. And finally, we’re ignoring the social roots—poverty, isolation, instability. These aren’t side issues. They’re central.

If you’ve spent any time in therapy—or just paid attention to your own soul—you know this: people don’t fall apart just because of bad brain chemistry. They break down when life stops making sense. Viktor Frankl put it plainly in Man’s Search for Meaning: people need purpose more than they need comfort. When purpose disappears, we don’t just get sad. We get disoriented. We start looking for substitutes—numbness, noise, escape.

And the research backs it up. A 2016 study in the Journal of Positive Psychology found that a lack of purpose strongly correlates with depression, anxiety, and suicidality. On the flip side, meaning-centered therapies—like logotherapy or narrative therapy—consistently help people build resilience in the face of trauma, grief, and long-term illness. So when people lose meaning, it’s not just a spiritual loss—it’s a public health emergency. And in a world that’s growing more isolated and disoriented by the day, that emergency isn’t silent anymore. It’s screaming.

In the span of just a few weeks, we’ve witnessed three brutal acts of violence: The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in Utah on September 10th. A school shooting at Evergreen High School in Colorado—same day. And the fatal stabbing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a Charlotte light rail train in late August. Three different states. Three different stories. But the same underlying crisis: people becoming so fractured, so untethered, that they lash out—not just at individuals, but at meaning itself.

Charlie Kirk was speaking at Utah Valley University when he was shot and killed by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson. Robinson turned himself in days later. Prosecutors are calling it a political assassination. But what’s eerie is what came before: a Discord server where Robinson had been posting violent rhetoric and memes, confessing his plan in real time. His bullets were engraved with “oh bella ciao,” a nod to anti-fascist meme culture. After the attack, he bragged about having written a manifesto.

That same day, 16-year-old Desmond Holly opened fire at his high school. Two classmates were injured. He died by suicide on the scene. Authorities say he’d been radicalized online. His social accounts were full of antisemitic posts, white supremacist symbols, Columbine references. He wore a shirt that said “WRATH,” imitating one of the Columbine shooters. Hours before the attack, he posted a photo of his revolver on X.

Just weeks earlier, 23-year-old Zarutska, who had fled the war in Ukraine, was stabbed to death on a light rail train in Charlotte. Her attacker, Decarlos Brown Jr., had a long history of untreated mental illness and prior convictions. There was no clear ideological motive—just a raw, disconnected act of violence.

These stories are terrifying—but they’re not random. They’re what happens when the human mind loses the ability to see others as human. When emotional pain goes untreated, and online echo chambers feed resentment like it’s oxygen.

Let’s be clear: not all radicalized people are mentally ill, and not all mentally ill people are violent. But there’s a dangerous overlap when untreated mental health, social isolation, and ideological extremism start to braid together.

A 2024 review in Frontiers in Psychiatry found that while mental illness alone isn’t a main driver of radicalization, it can heighten vulnerability in those who are already emotionally adrift.

What are the common threads? Identity voids—a deep hunger to belong, to feel seen. For some, that gets hijacked by online “tribes” that offer purpose through rage or ideology. Online echo chambers—places like Discord, Reddit, TikTok. Algorithms reward outrage. Memes become radical liturgies. Emotional fragility—not psychosis, but the inability to metabolize pain, fear, or contradiction. So the person doesn’t just disagree with others—they dehumanize them.

Extremist ideology is what some researchers call a complex contagion. The more your network reinforces a message—“you’re right to hate them,” “your pain is someone else’s fault”—the more likely you are to act on it.

None of these men were born monsters. But they were shaped by systems that failed to provide meaning, connection, or care. Kirk’s killer spiraled in a rage-fueled echo chamber. Holly mimicked school shooters to claim identity through infamy. Brown, left to cycle through a broken mental health system, exploded without warning. This isn’t just about ideology. It’s about the collapse of human dignity—our own, and the dignity we see in others.

Spend five minutes on any social media platform and you’ll feel it. Truth doesn’t float to the top—it gets filtered, weaponized, turned into content. After the Kirk shooting, graphic videos went viral. Within hours, people were calling for vengeance. Zarutska’s stabbing footage made the rounds too. And Holly’s disturbing pre-attack posts stayed online long enough to inspire copycats.

Our brains are wired to respond to emotional intensity. When we’re afraid, angry, or overwhelmed, our thinking narrows. It’s called the tunnel effect. Social media exploits that vulnerability. Algorithms prioritize what provokes. They don’t reward truth—they reward engagement. And that usually means outrage, fear, and division.

Social identity theory helps explain what’s going on. When our beliefs are tied to group belonging, disagreement doesn’t feel intellectual—it feels personal. Like betrayal. And that kills curiosity.

Discernment—the ability to hold complexity, question our assumptions, and seek truth—is becoming a lost art. And yet, it’s not beyond us. It’s a skill. It can be practiced. Through mindfulness. Through critical thinking. Through exposing ourselves to voices that challenge us without confirming our worst instincts. But the window is closing. And the cost of losing that skill is everything from broken relationships to literal violence.

These three stories—Kirk’s assassination, Holly’s rampage, Zarutska’s murder—aren’t just disturbing headlines. They’re spiritual MRI scans of a society in distress. So here’s where we pause and take inventory.

Where are you getting your sense of meaning? Is it sturdy, or is it built on clicks and approval? How do you respond to difference? Do you get curious—or defensive? Do you listen—or retreat? And when you’re online, are you becoming more grounded, or more reactive?

The truth is: meaning-making, emotional resilience, and discernment are not genetic. They’re cultivated. They’re choices. And they’re choices we need to start making with intention.

If this episode hit you hard, don’t just stew in it. Share it. Talk about it. Call a friend. Let it become a doorway to something deeper. And hey, if you think we’ve earned it, hit that subscribe button, drop us a five-star review—because as much as I hate to say it, the algorithm does need a little encouragement to share this kind of message.

Thanks for listening—and keep going. Catch you next time.

People on this episode